Allowing them to play in the VHSL as a school that has no true boundaries for residency
I think we have discussed this before but, the settlement that admitted LCA was the result of the recognition that they had neither the resources or the argument to ultimately prevail in litigation and they opted to settle in order to hopefully get an outcome beneficial to the entire VHSL membership rather than accept the risk of litigation with an outcome they might have no input in.
They negotiated attendance multipliers and zoning rules that lessened the potential impact on area schools. The fact that, to this point, no additional private schools have joined and that LCA has not been as competitively dominant as many predicted would seem to indicate they negotiated a reasonable settlement.
What do you know about the actual boundaries and residence requirements LCA agreed to abide by? Do you believe they should have taken the chance and risked litigation? How do you believe the LCA situation pertains to the current Hayfield situation?