Having read many posts over the last couple of weeks, I dat back ans realized how many of them mentioned officiating... To clarify, the threads mankind comments rarely mention "outstanding" as descriptors. I can't help but think how much officials impact these (playoff games) and, quite frankly, more than they should. There are discussions about "home cooking", situational misses, mystery flags, and huge impact ones that change outcomes. Why is that? I realize they aren't professionals and paid accordingly, but to some degree, I wonder how many of them review and discuss film provided to them by coaches. Or, if they don't, why don't they solicit film to enhance their product? I just read a thread about an official doing games at a school his child attended. Are you kidding me? Not to mention anyone by name, how many of you know officials and could rank them as oustanding, efficient, tolerable, to downright lousy? Most would probably say that if the team executed well enough, fewer opportunities for flags would be had, but is that always true? Would anyone make the argument that they are prone to more flags because of reputation? That's a stretch, but can't be out of the realm of possibility.
I'm not looking for confrontation, but the discussions raised an eyebrow, so I opened a thread...
I'm not looking for confrontation, but the discussions raised an eyebrow, so I opened a thread...