Fort Chiswell dominated the entire game, it could have been even worse. Great comeback after the loss against Galax last week.
Fort Chiswell dominated the entire game, it could have been even worse. Great comeback after the loss against Galax last week.
Sounds like excuses to me. Why did Tazewell dress 18-19 players and Fort Chiswell dress much more? That tells me somwthing. Tazewell sucks something God Awful because if you dress 18-19 players at a Class 2A school, then......well.........you suck something awful and somethings wrong. Tazewell played Richlands much closer by the score last week on VPreps, so however much little credit you give FC for the Tazewell win, you have to give Richlands even less credit as Tazewell's score was much closer with Richlands than it was FC.
What's the exuses? Tazewell wasn't expected by many to win any games at all this year. New head coach. only 7-9 upperclassmen came out for 2 a days. Not really sure why other than Tazewell's football culture has just been awful over the last 7-8 years.
They only fielded 27 for picture day and they've lost that many to injuries and such since then. The radio announcer said they dressed 21 last week and lost their QB and WR to injury so I figured 18-19 playing this week? I wasn't there so that's why I put it in question form.
Tazewell's leading rusher and receiver as well as the QB are all freshman and they've held their own and put up better numbers than you would expect for 14-15 year olds. Their freshman class as well as the current 8th grade class is very talented and big in numbers. The players that are out seem to be buying into the coach, so with the talent coming up & the numbers they'll add by replacing 3 seniors with 15 freshmen (plus I'm sure more upperclassme will come out next year that didn't this year) Tazewell should rebound and put a respectable team out in 2-3 years. But this year it is what it is.
Tazewell took Richlands into the 4th quarter last week only down 7-0, and that says more about Richlands than it does Tazewell. This week without the QB and receiver (who also start on D) i figured that Fort would roll. So again, I don't know what the excuses are you were talking about? I pointed out that Fort shouldn't be too high on this win because Tazewell is basically a JV team playing a varsity schedule.
Is Fort a good team? I don't know. That's why I was asking. I'm trying to figure it out now before I drive to Max Meadows next week to watch them play the G-Men.
Still sounds like excuses and definitely in the realm of a novel.
Fort has good talent and could be and probably should be, undefeated. I had heard we are trying to get back to last years team. Coaching must be fun at The Fort. I just wondering who the kid will be next year. Y’all pioneers know what I’m talking about. Can’t fault them boys doing what their told. I will say this, we have great kids because they do what them coaches tell them. Even when they know the shit ain’t gonna work. LoL!! Keep up the hard work boys.What's the excuse?
Tazewell? Not good now. I've explained why they aren't. So, Do you know if Fort would be considered good team? Because that's what I'm asking?
What's the excuse?
Tazewell? Not good now. I've explained why they aren't. So, Do you know if Fort would be considered good team? Because that's what I'm asking?
What's the excuse?
Tazewell? Not good now. I've explained why they aren't. So, Do you know if Fort would be considered good team? Because that's what I'm asking?
Tazewell is like the forgotten middle child between Richlands and Graham.
When they combined most of Pocahontas HS with Tazewell it was thought that the Bulldogs would benefit greatly and they did benefit that 1st season (2008) but for reasons I don't know that success was a one season occurrence.
I answered your questions about FC. They could be considered "better than Richland" this year. Tazewell just played em back to back. One game was much more competitive than the other.
If you’re gonna take a jab, at least spell Richlands right. Please.I answered your questions about FC. They could be considered "better than Richland" this year. Tazewell just played em back to back. One game was much more competitive than the other.
Take a jab how I please. Will spell Richlands how I choose. I'm not sure of the spelling due to Richlands choking like a chicken in a thunderstorm over the years.If you’re gonna take a jab, at least spell Richlands right. Please.
Take a jab how I please. Will spell Richlands how I choose. I'm not sure of the spelling due to Richlands choking like a chicken in a thunderstorm over the years.
Yes, you read that correct. I want go in to all the details of my opinion but they should be and very well could be.Should be undefeated?
And you are entitled to your opinionYes, you read that correct. I want go in to all the details of my opinion but they should be and very well could be.
Oh boy. Watch out, y’all. We’ve got a keyboard warrior over here.
Nice try at another jab. Too bad I’ve heard those same things for years so it doesn’t really bother us anymore. Oh, and while we’re at it, let’s go ahead and talk about “recruiting”, holdbacks and long cleats. Did I miss anything? I’m sure you’ll let me know.
Often teams that are better coached, beat teams with better talent. IMO that is. Our OC should not be allowed to call himself that. Kids watch film on their own and I’m thinking coaches don’t watch it at all. We have the pieces to have won every game, IMO and probably yours too. LoL!!And you are entitled to your opinion
Lol!! We will just have to agree to disagree on that being my opinionOften teams that are better coached, beat teams with better talent. IMO that is. Our OC should not be allowed to call himself that. Kids watch film on their own and I’m thinking coaches don’t watch it at all. We have the pieces to have won every game, IMO and probably yours too. LoL!!