ADVERTISEMENT

GW-26 Rad-18 FINAL!!!!!!

GW-26 rad-18 1min left in garbage time and they go for 2 oh well it will not change that W for GW lol
 
Last edited:
GW-26 rad-18 1min left in garbage time and they go for 2 oh well buffering the score late won't change that W for GW lol

I usually enjoy reading your posts, but you are off on this one Blaster. If it is 26-10 and Radford scores, with any time left, you DO go for 2, makes it 26-18 or an 8 point lead. They get ball back and score again and get 2 pt conversion its a tie ball game. It doesn't seem like from that they are trying to make it look better against your boys
 
  • Like
Reactions: G MASTER BLASTER W
I fully understand they can in theory still win but if you would have seen this game in person you would see this game should've been alot worse than it was. We fumbled the ball 4 times had 3 points taken off after 2 made FGs all because of flags. GW should've won big tonight. But I'm fine with an 8 point win just like I would've been with a 50 or a 1.
 
I fully understand they can in theory still win but if you would have seen this game in person you would see this game should've been alot worse than it was. We fumbled the ball 4 times had 3 points taken off after 2 made FGs all because of flags. GW should've won big tonight. But I'm fine with an 8 point win just like I would've been with a 50 or a 1.

Im not questioning the game or who should have won, i wasn't there I dont know. But the way you wrote it was it was terrible for the other team to go for 2 to make it look better, but they still had a chance, so they should have been trying to win the game, whether they should have been in the game or not
 
  • Like
Reactions: G MASTER BLASTER W
Excuses only satisfy the maker maybe Radford is better than what everyone gives them credit for or maybe GW is not as good as they are led on to be that's why we play the game. On this night GW was only 8 points better than Radford. We really don't care about would of should of could of a win is a win be thankful.
 
Excuses only satisfy the maker maybe Radford is better than what everyone gives them credit for or maybe GW is not as good as they are led on to be that's why we play the game. On this night GW was only 8 points better than Radford. We really don't care about would of should of could of a win is a win be thankful.
No I agree a win is a win and yes they could've took us to OT ans won the game. But my point is the game should've been out of reach by that point but 4 fumbles killed that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: woodlayer#952002
Im not questioning the game or who should have won, i wasn't there I dont know. But the way you wrote it was it was terrible for the other team to go for 2 to make it look better, but they still had a chance, so they should have been trying to win the game, whether they should have been in the game or not
I agree with you and I should've worded it better I'll take my lumps on that post.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT