Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More likely they are just shaking their head and considering GW the second tallest midget amongst dwarfs known as the Piedmont District.In before someone accuses G.W. of "running up the score."
Whatever makes you feel better.More likely they are just shaking their head and considering GW the second tallest midget amongst dwarfs known as the Piedmont District.
An honest and realistic assessment of the program for once would be a start. My previous reply was what your post about running up the score was calling for.Whatever makes you feel better.
Sure it does. For anybody not watching they might even attribute some of that something to GW as opposed to the more plausible reason that Halifax is historically bad. Just to be clear, the Halifax assessment is from several former Western District and Piedmont District coaches. Karma coming home for Senseney from his Gretna days maybe?Second largest amount of points scored in a seventy nine game rivalry says something about something.
Everybody is entitled to their opinion. I will defer to the former coaches but, historically bad does not necessarily mean they are alone just that there is not much company.I have seen way worse Comet teams although they are very weak in the line.
I think GW is better than that but, not sure how much better. I feel bad for the kids and to some extent the coaches as well. Over the last two years with construction they have been confronted with challenges that any high school team would have a tough time overcoming. They have been poorly served by the powers that be, IMO. This, in my opinion, is a Danville issue, specifically school leadership and city government.Talent wise. Halifax and Mecklenburg are top 5 worst teams in C4. GW is in the top 10. Nothing to see here.
GW has talent but to your point, a lot of those circumstances have not helped. Even with the construction, we should be a lot better and should certainly not beat inept teams like Halifax and Martinsville and beat our chests. Realistically, GW should never have down years against the teams they play.I think GW is better than that but, not sure how much better. I feel bad for the kids and to some extent the coaches as well. Over the last two years with construction they have been confronted with challenges that any high school team would have a tough time overcoming. They have been poorly served by the powers that be, IMO. This, in my opinion, is a Danville issue, specifically school leadership and city government.
I highly doubt they catch either one sleeping but anything can happen on a Friday nightI know this is a contentious thread, but don't look now with two wins GW will finish at 6-4 and make the playoffs as an eight seed. I know that may be a consolation prize; however, it could create some positive vibes going into next season. Anything to lift this young teams spirits would be good for everybody. Who knows you might catch JF or Salem sleeping and looking ahead. Go Eagles!
If GW finishes 6-4, would they be able to pass a 5-5 Sherando or Handley in the point standings?227-229
I just did the math @tommythecpa I have GW getting 52 points with their next two wins and 10 additional rider points for 230. That will put them at 230/23.0 and likely a 7 seed. They have a slight chance of catching Sherando if they lose to Handley but no chance of catching Handley. Even with two losses their Rider points gained in the next two weeks will keep them ahead.If GW finishes 6-4, would they be able to pass a 5-5 Sherando or Handley in the point standings?
I hope you are right but I question the 52 points for winning. I see 50. My calculations are 22 for a win this week, 20 for a win over 3A Tunstall plus 8 bonus points.I just did the math @tommythecpa I have GW getting 52 points with their next two wins and 10 additional rider points for 230. That will put them at 230/23.0 and likely a 7 seed. They have a slight chance of catching Sherando if they lose to Handley but no chance of catching Handley. Even with two losses their Rider points gained in the next two weeks will keep them ahead.
50 for the next two weeks.I hope you are right but I question the 52 points for winning. I see 50. My calculations are 22 for a win this week, 20 for a win over 3A Tunstall plus 8 bonus points.
Is Mecklenburg 5A? I know there is some debate. When the school opened it was assumed they were 4A but then rumors started circulating that they had 5A numbers but because of their geographic location and the fact that they were new, the VHSL was allowing them to compete as a 4A school. I'm not sure I ever believed that but to this day that rumor persists.
If they win the next two weeks they will get 44 points straight up. Even though Tunstall is a class three team and you get 20 points they also get the additional classification 2 points that equal 22. They cannot get less than 22 period. They also get two points for every Tunstall win plus the additional rider points from opponents in the next two weeks. I think it will be 8 and they will finish with 52. Rider points are the only debate here. Look in the sticky threads above it will explain the points system.50 for the next two weeks.
I said this in week one that I saw potential in this GW team. Against Dinwiddie the Eagles were a bit mismatched, but they added to the problem by shooting themselves in the foot. A few caught balls instead of dropped ones could have made a difference.Thanks Bleeding Navy. Our critics will point to a weak district and I'll admit it isn't the best but we are a different team than the one that lost some of those early games. The young OL has matured and we've found an identity. If we can get in we will be a tough out for someone.