Hoos, I agree with you concerning Salem in last year's final. I think Salem's game plan was to be very conservative and use brute force to try and knock LT off the ball for 4 or 5 yard gains. It seemed reasonable as no other team had been able to stop it. However, LT's Dline was having none of that. They were quciker and just as strong and as Mike has said before, their victory in that aspect was ultimately the downfall of that Salem squad. Salem wanted to play Salem football and cash in on LT mistakes. As Devils has mentioned, their defense is "high risk/high reward." My guess is Salem was hoping there would be enough missed assignments to allow for big plays for their O. The problem was LT didn't make many mistakes. Salem exploited one or two (the Clayborne long TD comes to mind), but not enough were made for Salem to really jump on and get out ahead. Furthermore, Salem made too many mistakes themselves such as poor tackling on the PR return and Clayborne's fumble when they were driving. Fox's ankle was a factor anyway you look at it. As much as he was missed on O, I think the real casualty was on D. He was limping badly even at the start of the game. It really showed on the Shiheem run for a TD. A healthy Fox takes him down much earlier on in the play, IMO. FWIW, I still think Salem would have lost with everyone healthy, but think it would have been MUCH closer. Now, just to spark some discussion...I don't think Salem will play nearly as conservative with any team they face in the playoffs this season. They don't have to! As stated in the previous discussions, they're deeper, faster, and the defense has really come together for what IMO is an overall stronger unit. In the West, Woodgrove, Champe, GW, Sherando, and of course, JF are great teams that will be tough for anyone, Salem included. I'm also interested in Pulaski, although I don't think they're at the elite level in 4A West "yet". In any case, the playoffs are not far away and all this will get sorted out soon enough.