Re: Six different sources rated Salem the number two team in 4A for 2014
No problem. No hurt feelings here - but I think you knew that. You know you have nothing to back you up, so you have to throw that smoke screen up. Pretty standard message board behavior, even from the more esteemed posters.
Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion. [Does that hold true for me, as well?] Thanks for helping to bolster my point. Of the six different polls that I cited, at least one - VaPreps - is based on peoples' opinions. Am I not correct in thinking that they arrive at their poll results by a vote of their people that cover high school football? If so, Rod can correct me, and I'll be happy for the correction. So, in the opinion of some knowledgeable people at VaPreps, Salem was the second-best team in 4A. That's ALL of 4A.
That's at least one opinion-based poll (Maxpreps might also be?), and a few numbers-based polls, that all support my assertion that Salem was better than all other non-Lake Taylor 4A South teams. My point is, I have six different sources backing me up, and they all reach their conclusions in different ways - and they're not all based on computers. All you have backing up your opinion is, "Because I say so." And yes - games are played on the field. You're assuming that Heritage, Monacan, Dinwiddie, Phoebus et al would all have beaten Salem this past season. Care to offer anything to support that assumption? All the numbers (ie Gilliams, CalPreps, etc.) and experts' (ie VaPreps) opinions are against you.
You do know that I don't have anything to do with how the playoffs are run, right? I would love to see all six classifications cross-bracket the semis - as long as there are still regional championship games. Regions that encompass 24-plus schools demand to have a champion crowned; that is an accomplishment. Also, I don't think it's fair, with many districts no longer crowning an official champion, to say to the kids in 1A through 3A - "Okay, fellas. You either win state, or you win nothing at all." Most of those schools have no realistic shot at a state title, so there should be district and regional titles to strive toward.
I'd be in favor of cutting the playoffs back to eight teams per region, and having state semis the week after the regional championships. The playoffs would take the same amount of time, we'd have regional champions, and cross-bracketing in the semis. The same as basketball used to have. It won't happen, because having losing teams continue play is unheard of in football, but that is what I would like to see.
I wouldn't worry about the North (West) managing to stay within two touchdowns of the state champs. At least, not until the South (East) can also manage to do that. Because as has been observed several times now over the past fifteen months, neither Dinwiddie nor LT were the typical 4A South team. Both were exceptional, much better than all other schools in 4A in their respective years - and that includes all the other 4A South teams. And VaPreps, MaxPreps, CalPreps, VHSL-Reference, and Gilliam Ratings all bear that out.
This post was edited on 3/4 10:21 PM by SpartanOfYore