Good input - gave me some food for more thought! Was scheduling a problem for smaller schools before they came up with the "playing down" bonus points? I'm sure it is for some no matter what. I think these types of points have only been around for only a relative handful of years (with the advent of the current six classes). The bonus is worth 2 points per class for both district and OOD games now, that is a change from when they first started applying them.
I know my alma mater (son's on current team so have vested interest) lost out on a playoff berth this year by 0.6 ratings points because one of the other teams had 18 more points based on playing down (not from winning or losing, just playing). Side by side schedule comparisons do not sit well. No matter what, team didn't take care of its own business plus a couple of our non-district wins had much worse than expected seasons which cost us heavily. Current district leaves no room for any type of let down not even a small one.
Yes teams had problems before the East/West, back when it was Regions before. But the main difference back then was teams who won districts got automatic bids, and teams with 9-1 records sometimes got left out.
I dont know what team you are for, and you probably have no idea about the small teams down here, which is understandable. Do since this is a 4a board, I will use a few teams as an example, just a hypothetical.
IF teams didnt get points for playing down, then the vast majority of teams would only play 4a teams in OOD. So then your opportunities base largely on your location if you dont want to travel all over the state for good games. And remember the open weeks have to line up. So use 4B as the example. With just the top 4 teams, maybe Dinwiddie and Louisa get good games worked out, while Monacan and Eastern View cant that's just 4 teams and a lot more goes into it than that. But teams can only play so many games, so for everyone that puts Dinwiddie on the schedule, to keep up the other would have to have a Dinwiddie caliber team. And that may work for the top teams in each region, but how about the up and coming teams. Just a couple years ago Amherst was a top team in state and Glass wasnt, not its flipped.
Not to try to sound smart or anything, because maybe you understand the points great, but a lot of people dont understand the points. You said they got 18 points. Well I will use wins as the example.
For playing up 2 classes is the difference in 2 wins, so since I am used to doing the points for 2a, do it every week on here, 18 points and 2 per win. So if you beat a 2 win 2a team, that is 22 points. The same as a 0 win 4a team.
So a 6a team beating a 2 win 4a is 26 points and 4 for the play down for a total of 30. Same as a 2 win 6a team. Assuming both the teams you are referring to played 10 games, that .6 is 6 total points.