The poster alleging collusion by officials is ridiculous. They're out here for the love of the game and for the kids. They see a foul and they call it. Do they miss some? Obviously, it's a part of the game. But to allege intentional conspiracy against one team? Ridiculous. That's the only response necessary to a post like that.
Disclaimer: I’ve been a die-hard Bird fan for 20 years, so feel free to dismiss this as the delusional rantings of a Bird fanatic and go about your day.
I don’t see how anyone can watch Bird week after week and not think there’s a little something up between Bird and the refs. It has nothing to do with Monacan or any other team Bird is playing, it’s between Bird’s coaching staff and the refs. For example, Bird's opening game against Meadowbrook last year, a ref signals to Bedwell to come over between plays (presumably to tell him something), and as soon as Bedwell steps on the field the same ref flags him for a sideline warning. There's some kind of history there that started long before my time.
Bird has always been a run first offense, which generally leads to more holding penalties. I’m not trying to say that Bird doesn’t hold, because all high school teams do, but here are some of the issues I have with how those penalties get called:
· More than half the holding flags against Bird get thrown behind the line of scrimmage when the running back is 10+ yards past the line of scrimmage. If you’re going to throw a flag, throw it when the hold happens, not when you see that it’s going to be a big play.
· You’ve got refs 20 yards away from the play and out of position throwing holding flags against Bird, yet they don’t call blatant holds by Bird opponents when they’re positioned 5 yards away from the play.
· Penalties against Bird (especially holding calls) tend to drop off significantly later in the playoffs when it’s not a local officiating crew.
· In games where Bird’s opponent is significantly overmatched, there are multiple holding calls every series at the beginning of the game when it’s still close. Those penalties tend to drop off after Bird is up 3-4 scores and the second and third string is in.
Not saying this is any condemning evidence of collusion, but when you watch it week after week for 20+ years, it does tend to get old and lead you to think that something isn’t right.
Then there’s the disparity in penalties called against each team, which almost always goes against Bird. This isn’t specific to last week’s game against Monacan, but there were a couple pretty blatant holds that Monacan didn’t get called for, which happens every game when you play Bird. On one punt return, Bird signaled for a fair catch well in advance and a Monacan kid ran into the punt returner – not a ton of contact and not malicious, but still clear kick catch interference and no flag. Later, when Monacan attempted an onside kick that didn’t go 10 yards and one of their players touched the ball while it was still live, there was no flag for illegal touching. There’s always going to be some margin of error, especially in high school officiating, but those were two pretty obvious ones that got ignored.
Over the years, I’ve seen that in Bird games, flags usually cost Bird two touchdowns a game – whether it’s offensive touchdowns getting called back or drives getting killed with penalties, or defensive flags against Bird keeping the opponent’s drive alive and leading to scores. How much of that is Bird doing it to themselves and how much is ref bias depends on what side of the fence you’re on.
In the past, Bird has been good enough to cover that spread. However, with Bird’s (not altogether unexpected) nosedive this year coupled with Manchester and Monacan’s rise, Bird can’t cover it this year. Funny thing is, with the way the playoffs are set up now, it doesn’t really matter if Bird went 10-0 or 7-3 in the regular season – the best they could get is a 3-seed and one home game. Now they’re looking at a 4-seed still with the home game, then either way have to travel to Herm or HSHS in the second round and most likely get blown out.
Clearly it’s been a down year for Bird with Bedwell stepping down, but even with him at the helm I don’t think this year’s team would get past Herm or HSHS anyway.
Good news for Skyhawk fans is that we should have our pick of coaches for next year and can start to rebuild.
I appreciate this very well articulated post and I can see every point that you've made. Allow me to counter from the other side of the line with a sport's official's perspective.
Bird historically has been one of the most penalized teams in the state, but a neutral observer will also tell you that they do foul more than most teams in the state as well. Not to say you can't be a neutral observer as a fan, because you can. It's just extremely difficult and there is always a faint tinge of bias even if you don't mean for there to be.
The way you painted the picture with the official and Bedwell sounds like you didn't hear the conversation that occurred between them. The sideline warning could very well have been via the conversation rather than the official calling the coach on the field and flagging him. That, I will guarantee you, is not how it happened. I know that because a sideline warning is only given for being in the restricted area while the ball is live (not while it's dead as you said). The official could have given a verbal warning to stay out of the restricted area while the ball was live, and the coach may have said some words which took the verbal warning to an actual one.
For your first point about holding fouls thrown behind the runner, there's something many fans need to know about flags. One officiating principle that encompasses all sports is "advantage / disadvantage." In relation to football, before you throw the flag, you need to ask yourself, "did this affect the play?" If the defender is held, but he still makes the tackle, did it affect the play? No. If there is a hold at the point of attack and another defender tackles the runner behind where the hold took place, was there an advantage? No. Operating on this principle, officials hold their flags until they know that an actual advantage was gained. This is a very good officiating practice that removes unnecessary penalties from being thrown. While that flag may have been thrown 10 yards behind the runner, the holding foul undoubtedly took place a few seconds prior to when it was thrown while the runner was still in that area. The official was just patient to make sure that the foul actually affected the play and an advantage was gained. Seeing as the runner gained at least 10 more yards after the foul, a flag was warranted.
You mentioned a referee throwing a flag while they are out of position, but do you know the mechanics yourself? Do you know what that officials keys and responsibilities are during that play? What specific player is he responsible for? If you aren't an official yourself, I would have to guess no. Many times, a deep official that is far away from the play has the best look on certain fouls and they are within his coverage area. Just because the flag is thrown from a great distance doesn't mean the foul didn't occur or that the official wasn't observing his primary responsibility.
To your 3rd point about local crews, the Richmond area, in my opinion, has some of the best officials in the state top to bottom. Have you ever thought that maybe when LCB travels out of the area, the "non-local" crews may not be as well trained or experienced, and therefore let things go (like holds) that good officials do not?
To your point about not throwing flags when the game is well out of hand, when the game is tight it has to be called by the book. But, the best thing a crew can do when the game is extremely lopsided and there is no hope for a comeback is to get the game over with as quickly as possible. The only thing that can come of the game at that point is potential fights or unsportsmanlike acts. Throwing minor penalties only stop the clock and make the game last way longer than it needs to, which is a recipe for disaster with one team extremely happy and one team extremely down or frustrated. Also, as a general note, I've heard many officials tell me that the 2nd and 3rd teams play much cleaner than the starters. I don't know why, but it's something they've noticed overall. They'll make simple mistakes like encroachments and false starts, but they don't commit fouls like holding as much.
To your point about the onside kick, there was no flag on that play because there's not supposed to be a flag on that play. The kicking team touching the ball in the neutral zone on a free kick (i.e., the 10 yards between the K and R restraining lines) is referred to as FIRST touching (in HS), not illegal touching. First touching is not a foul. It's treated the same as if the kicking team touched the ball on a punt beyond the neutral zone. The receiving team has the option of taking the ball at that spot, so a bean bag is thrown there,
not a flag.
I have a lot of fans ask me if I could give them one piece of advice about watching games, what would it be? My answer: if you don't know for 100% certainty what is written in the rules book or general officiating mechanics,
do not assume. Assuming without due diligence leads to things like believing the officials got it wrong or that the officials are conspiring against your team. 100% certainty does not mean "I've seen this enforced 1000 times, I know it" or "I saw this in a high school / college game last week." 100% certainty means you have placed your own eyes on the exact rule in question in the NFHS Football Rules Book. If every fan would take a few minutes to do the research and open the book, it would open their eyes that much wider to the game that they love, and maybe they wouldn't yell at those zebras as much. (Yeah right!)
Just an inside look on the other side of the fence.
Side note / plug: the number of officials across the country are down dramatically. Most officials' reasons for not continuing are the treatment they receive by fans and coaches, which has gotten exponentially worse in the last 10-15 years. These shortages are going to be felt widespread, so I ask fans to do one of two things: stop berating officials if you want to see your sport exist (without officials, it won't), OR, keep yelling but become an official yourself! God knows we need the numbers.