ADVERTISEMENT

Low numbers for some schools in SWVA

WPO and Dinnwiddie

WPO-Agree with every bit of what you wrote in all 3 of your last posts. My opinion only, but I agree with you. It's one thing to perhaps have "old school" ways to deal with things or what may be perceived as "unconventional" which are kind of my direction. Many, maybe or most most would disagree with my opinions on the solutions, but......as you eluded to......they are at least an opinion on a solution versus simply maintaining status quo. You and UVA hinted at that and again, I think your spot on. You have got to do something. You can't continue to the same thing or go in the same direction if the current one isn't working.

Dinwiddie-Agree. This was mentioned earlier in the thread regarding the widespread effect, but the larger schools, or roughly Class 3A through 6A can absorb that hit and don't truly feel the effects simply because they have such of a larger number in the student population to choose from. You're right.

WPO-Regarding Solutions, again, I think innovation is critical as UVA first pointed out. Innovation can take many forms. Technology can be our friend and enemy. The innovative coach, staff, and administration makes technology our friend, and it's a benefit for the good. So, here are point-hitting specific solutions (my opinion only) that Giles could pursue. Before I give these below Giles fans, understand that one of your fans ASKED in a public forum for suggestions and thoughts. Some Giles fans (not all, but some) have been fickle over the years about thoughts or perceptions of their program on this board. I'm certain of it. I've been here a long time and engaged with a few of which I'm certain are great people, but some of them get a little fickle, so here goes Giles fans since Spartan asked.

1. Define the problem. Is there a problem? Is 27 one snapshot in time? For example, do you have 50 kids out in your 7th and 8th grade classes in which you know you will likely be fine in a couple of years? Or.....are these grades also way down in numbers? Is your current junior and senior classes 2 of the smallest classes in the last 40 or so years in total population of the students in the school, etc? So, for starters make sure it's actually a problem and not a one or two year thing that will pass. Step one should take 5 minutes of research. If it is a problem, then........

2. Determine WHY the numbers are down. For example, are you 100% sure it's concussions coupled with maybe an influence of video games? Ask the parents. If the numbers are only 27 this year, there has to be a few kids that played in 9th or 10th grade that are not out this year. Ask the parents why. The coaching staff should ask the parents of the kid, not the kid, but the parents why the kid (in the parents opinion) did not come out for football. The kid may simply give a response as to "I just wasn't into football coach" which is an answer based out of fear of disapproval by the coaches. The parents should be asked. Again, the sad part which leads back to my point about old school methods is that the coaches in today's time practice in a fear based model. They want to win and do well, but one wrong word on the phone or at the (in house) visit could lead to job loss or litigation. That's the problem with going to far to the left, or where we try so hard to strive for "change." The effects are felt in these areas, but this is the step that has to be taken, and you must find out exactly why the numbers are down.

3. Understand our culture today is instant gratification, reward, and fun. Kids today (because of their parents and our culture, media, etc) simply can't truly.....truly and deeply feel the effects of short term NO-gratification with the long term reward. Our brain matter and schema has changed that the majority of us simply aren't wired this way; therefore, you better make it fun. This is where innovation comes in. For example, combine study hall and practice with a dinner one time per week. As an example, Charlotte-Country Day has mandatory study hall for 1.5 hours after school with fitness shorts, underpad t-shirts, and some coaches and teachers there for assistance. The school-boosters-parents also give the kids a huge meal every Wednesday afternoon before study hall and practice. This is in addition to the Friday pre-game meal which is still ongoing and pretty consistent in most places even in 2018. What does this do? It gets some (not all) but some of the parents to buy in. You know your kid isn't getting into trouble. You know your kid is studying, and he gets a huge meal on Wednesday's just as a social-team building event. Most important, the COACHES and administration EXPLAIN, communicate that to the parent or parents. It goes a long way. That is a form of innovation for sure.

4. Music in practice is huge as one poster eluded to. The important part is, music at selected times during practice. There are times for concentration and there are times in which going over and over on the fundamentals (grunt work) are critical. The music at the selected times is incredibly innovative and smart in my opinion. Also, take it a step further. Play the music through the speaker system if one is available on the practice field.

5. A Cause OUTSIDE of football to build the team. Jim Boeheim, who I really don't like in personality and he sometimes sickens me with his smugness, but...…..he made an absolute brilliant statement I will never forget regarding the "players taking a knee in the NFL" and all of that stuff. He was asked on whether players should be allowed to express themselves in an athletic-student forum on social issues. It was a "gotcha" question and Jim Boeheim gave a brilliant answer, and make no mistake about it, he can flat out coach. I don't care for the man, but the dude can coach. Anyway, his answer was...….they can sound off some and speak out in interviews, but they dam* better be sure they are doing other things to back up those statements outside of basketball on their time. He talked about volunteering at food shelters, mission trips in the summer time, helping those in need, and putting those words into action and not just going along with the "talking heads." So, at it relates to Giles. The coaching staff and town need a cause for the players. For example, every summer, the football time at Giles performs a two-week camp helping to build homes, digging ditches, hammering roofs, etc; to those in far Southwestern VA or Southern WV that may be stricken by poverty. How is it funded? The government is all over stuff like this when it comes to youths helping others. There are organizations that are begging for the literal manpower and for these organizations, finding a place for 40 or 50 people to sleep and feed 3 times a day for 2 weeks is chump-change. What does it do? It builds the team. It forms cohesiveness. It allows the parents to buy in. For 2 weeks of the summer, look at what their kid is doing. It helps the kids truly see what their work ethic can do to help others, and equally important, for this kind of work, this is a situation in which literally ALL of the kids participating would be a winner. It is something to be rewarded not just in the form of T-shirts or a Town Celebration which is nice, but again.....be more innovative. Give the kids who participate some academic credits.

It may sound like the above is somewhat farfetched. I get that, but...…..if your numbers are dropping, you dang sure better do something different to get the kids to buy in. Of course, in my opinion, I also would add in the tough love such as some yelling, screaming, and cursing during practice to let that self-esteem get its a** handed to it, but that's just me. No question though, you have to do something different, and the programs that will do better are the ones that will truly show more innovation. I think Richlands may be an example. I don't know exactly what they have out, but I know this, when we (Poquoson) played them in the state title game, it seemed like Richlands should have played their fight-song twice because kids continued to run out of the locker room for what seemed like a heck of a long time. It seems like they have a small college team regarding numbers, especially when compared to the amount of kids out for football in relation to the total number of males in the school. That's innovative. I suspect that is there coach getting kids to buy in, but to do that, he's getting the parent, parents, or guardians to buy in.
 
The best leaders are charismatic disciplinarians. Not just charismatic. Not just disciplinarians. I just don’t believe that should or needs to include profanity at the HS level. It has nothing to do with PC or religious feelings. Profanity is a shortcut in my opinion. As a leader, I view profanity at the HS level the same as a kid cutting corners jogging laps. It might get you there faster, but you lack integrity.

I agree with your WPO. I respect your opinion. I'm a fan of profanity in coaching at selected times. But, I concede the point that in my guess, the majority of people are absolutely not for coaches being profane at the High School Level. I suspect many would have this belief not related to PC or rightwing, leftwing, etc. I get that. There's no question, many of the most effective coaches in our history at not just High School, but even the upper levels don't use profanity and I respect the heck out of it. Littleton Parker is a friend of mine. He's the coach at Southampton, and has been since the 1800's. Actually, Riddick and I are closer, but the point is, if a kid cusses in practice at Southampton, the absolute on-slot or verbal beatdown coming from Littleton would make the kid had wished he would have never cussed. He doesn't tolerate it, period.

What I'm getting at is this regarding the cursing thing and the old school disciplinarian thing, etc. The old school coaches were not always right. The same applies to the new school coaches and vice-versa. But, one of the biggest misconceptions in our society that has effected the outcome of our youth in the past 20 to 25 years is the protection of self-esteem. This theory in protecting and not harming a child's self esteem in one that has absolutely devastated our society in dramatic fashion. The psychiatric and psychological scientists flooded this theory (that was unproven) into our school systems in the early 70's. It truly took off in the late 90's. Now, several major theorists and researchers in this area have literally issued an apology. The theory was not just unproven, it was actually dead wrong. Studies have clearly demonstrated that the best way to deal with adversity is by...…….as simple as it seems.....dealing with previous adversity. The problem is...there's no going back. This prevalent way of thinking has been politicized and tied into money. People now have financial obligations to uphold it. The truth is, when we give the third grader a soccer trophy on a team that finished last, we are actually causing HARM to that kid when they become 30 years old. The data is clear. It's there. This is what I'm getting at. The protection of self-esteem from no harm is absolutely harmful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WP02alum
We don’t disagree on needing to allow kids to experience adversity. No argument from me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: obguthr
Don't think for one minute that it's just a SWVa issue. It's a rare school that isn't experiencing a decrease in football participants. The problem is just exasperated in the smaller schools. When your varsity roster starts to dip under 30, it's a problem.

But, back to the original question, why the falling numbers and how do you reverse the trend? Let me work on something simpler first, like world peace!
Video games and I-phones keep the kids attention and they are addicted to these and will not give them up;
so, they stay in the house with their nose stuck in a computer screen all day. These kids get lazy, fat, and
very unhealthy. Also with the VHSL allowing football to be a 12 month sport, it takes a lot of the fun out
of it and it becomes more like a job. Parents also do not do a lot of parenting these days. The next time
you go out and eat look around the restaurant and see how many people have their face stuck in an I-phone. Communication skills are a thing of the past.
 
Video games and I-phones keep the kids attention and they are addicted to these and will not give them up;
so, they stay in the house with their nose stuck in a computer screen all day. These kids get lazy, fat, and
very unhealthy. Also with the VHSL allowing football to be a 12 month sport, it takes a lot of the fun out
of it and it becomes more like a job. Parents also do not do a lot of parenting these days. The next time
you go out and eat look around the restaurant and see how many people have their face stuck in an I-phone. Communication skills are a thing of the past.
Year round could be a issue because the devices have been being used years before it started being as big a issue.IMO
I still agree just think year round doesn't help numbers in the lower class divisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bulldog1150
Year-round deregulation is a HUGE negative for small schools. Those places MUST have coaches that work together & share time. Unfortunately, there’s a lot of narcissistic coaches out there who don’t understand this & try to force kids to be one-sport athletes.
 
Last edited:
As someone who has a step-son who will be 5 at his next birthday and looking at the opportunity of football in the very near future, my wife and I have had MANY discussions about it.

We are currently leaning towards not letting him play. Concussions scare the $hit out of me. I've had 4. I know what they do to you, and with the longterm effects of CTE that we are beginning to see, I don't know that I want to see that happen to him.

Now, if he desperately wants to play, we may reverse course. But so far, he has shown no interest in football, be it VT/NFL games on the TV or having taken him to a few Richlands games. It just hasn't hooked him yet. But that doesn't mean it won't I suppose.

He's also very tiny. Just 27 pounds at his last doctors appointment as a 4 year old is way low. And his doctors are trying to help us get his weight up. He literally just doesn't want to eat that much lol.

Just some insights for y'all into the mind of a couple of parents looking at football in the future.
 
As someone who has a step-son who will be 5 at his next birthday and looking at the opportunity of football in the very near future, my wife and I have had MANY discussions about it.

We are currently leaning towards not letting him play. Concussions scare the $hit out of me. I've had 4. I know what they do to you, and with the longterm effects of CTE that we are beginning to see, I don't know that I want to see that happen to him.

Now, if he desperately wants to play, we may reverse course. But so far, he has shown no interest in football, be it VT/NFL games on the TV or having taken him to a few Richlands games. It just hasn't hooked him yet. But that doesn't mean it won't I suppose.

He's also very tiny. Just 27 pounds at his last doctors appointment as a 4 year old is way low. And his doctors are trying to help us get his weight up. He literally just doesn't want to eat that much lol.

Just some insights for y'all into the mind of a couple of parents looking at football in the future.
Very real, and very honest of you, my friend. May he grow up to be as wise, thoughtful, and considerate as his step-father.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT