Anybody have a question/problem with some of the calls last night? I thought on Boise' last punt return the block in the back flag that was picked up should have stood. The explanation the viewer is given that the player fell on his back so it must have been hit from front. Is this the logic now used? If you watch the angle the blocker had approaching the defender, who is taking a direct path to the ball carrier, it would be almost impossible for him to get in front of that guy. Also, I believe a player running close to full speed could get hit in the back, take another step, and with that momentum and the collision, could get turned and land on his back. Guess he should have flopped better. How do the refs change this? The other play I question was the late hit on the last drive where the VT backer hit the runner while the runner was tight-roping the sideline only a few yards after barely stepping out of bounds. Isn't there some common sense consideration here for a player sake? Shouldn't it be pretty flagrant (like at least clearly off the playing field) to call it at that point in the game? I'd like to hear some refs opinions as I don't believe we can get much from Musberger.