Thanks for the long post stating the obvious. You are the one who has the personal vendetta. It's you who is probably the least liked person in that whole town. It's you who made the decision for your son to go to Christchurch. You know good as anyone else that your son would have been the feature back this year. I do find it funny that you praised Coach Briggs above, yet quoted a reply from him above telling him to keep scrolling if he didn't like it. You constantly bashed Briggs when he was head coach and whether it was Jack Lawson who is the head coach or the board selected someone else, you'd still be complaining. I'm sure you will do the same thing at Christchurch as well, and they will soon find out what all of West Point already knows. You're a disgruntled parent who is trying to live out his dreams through his kid.
For someone who is far removed from this town, you sure do make a lot of false claims.
False Claim #1: I have the vendetta. I saw again, go ask JL why he has not spoken a word to my son since the end of the football season. He never wanted my son on the team.
False Claim #2: I did not make my son play anywhere. Again, if you are so far removed from WP, who is feeding you this garbage? My son made the decision to play elsewhere, none of us even knew Christchurch was an option until another WP parent told us about it. Go ask some other local HC and they will tell you the same thing--everyone already knew that Lawrence did not want to play for JL.
False Claim #3: I'll complain at CCS. I won't have a reason to complain. Those coaches know what they are doing and they have a long history of placing kids into college football programs. And they play the best 11 and don't play kids based on who their parents are, whether they are seniors, or whether they are friends with the parents.
False Claim #4. I'm the most hated person in WP. Actually, I'm probably right below anyone involved in the decision to fire the French teacher. But I'll throw this little factoid out, that you obviously don't know, which is Jack is not as liked in WP as he makes everyone believe.
When Briggs nominated the OC to replace him as the HC, Jack Lawson sent out emails, PMs, texts and calls to just about everyone he knows in a town of 3500 asking for them to show up to the school board meeting to protest the hiring of the OC as HC and instead voice their support that he should be the HC. Do you know how many showed up to the school board meeting to support Jack? 2 people; Jack and another parent, which it was not clear if that parent was there to support Jack or to just see the fireworks. A second parent showed up to encourage the SB to confirm the OC, who was a
WPHS teacher. And Jack left early after he was told by a School Board member that he was not allowed to speak because he did not register ahead of time to speak. And if that was not pitiful enough, the only descending vote to approve the OC as the new HC was a "no" vote from Jack's own sister, who was on the school board. The next slap in the face for the new HC came when the new HC was forced by the outgoing principle to take Jack on as a paid assistant varsity coach after Jack made an end around to oust the OC as the HC. This overt attempt to deny the OC was the third slap in the face by the administration, the first being when the OC was not selected to be the AD by the outgoing principle, after the OC had performed the job as the interim AD for over a year. These three stabs in the back played a role in why the OC eventually declined the HC position and took a job elsewhere. Never love anything that doesn't love you back. The former OC will tell you that he took another teaching job to be closer to his home, but I think everyone can read between the lines. He left because he was not supported at every turn. He is now not coaching football at his new school.
So, there's a lot of dirty politics that you don't know about (or whoever is encouraging you to post is not telling you).
It's all a moot point, because the season will be here soon enough and then all of the excuses will come as to how they went from 5 points away from being Region 1A champions to maybe a 4-6 season if they are lucky. Jack wanted to be the HC from jump, but did not volunteer or organize an offseason weight training from November through February 8 when he was hired by the school board. He did nothing from Feb 9 until June 14, when he held his first meeting with the players. That's 7 months of nothing as the HC while other schools in our district and region have been lifting and training since the last down of football. He did not field a team for 7-7, under the guise "to prevent injuries" but when the Mathews HC invited him to 7-7, he told the Mathews coach that he asked the players and none of the players were interested in participating in 7-7. Preventing injuries is an excuse. Jack has never believed 7-7 was worthwhile because he throws the ball twice a game, if that. He should just come out and own that instead of making excuses. In the 16 years that I was involved with WP football, I recall two players getting injured in 7-7, but I recall several players getting injured every year during August practice. So using Stretch's logic, WP should not hit during August because the risk of injury outweighs the gains?