CONFERENCE DIRECTORS SHOULD BE INDEPENDENT
VHSL needs to provide a more definitive set of criteria, without room for districts to use the rules or lack of rules for a competitive advantage. Rules should be in black and white and consistent throughout all the districts.
Judging by Lighthouse 52 previous post, it sounds like the conference director is associated with the Tri-Rivers district. By nature, people have a tendency to look after their own and if left unchecked most will do so.
In fairness, they should be independent, especially if the rules are not definitive. In this case calling a one game playoff, a tournament, to qualify for the requirements of a higher seed is wrong and not in the true spirit of the game or the rules. It guaranteed someone from the Tri-Rivers a Number 1 seed. An independent director would have hopefully called this out for what it was and disallowed it.
By not having planned for and played a real tournament, the Tri-Rivers should have suffered the consequences for not doing so and rewarded the team that did.
You could resolve some of these issues as well by not rewarding the Number 1 seed with a bye and automatic Regional berth. They already benefit by playing the lowest seed and being in the bracket with the lower seeds as opposed to the 2 and 3 seed side of the bracket. With so many subjective issues used to determine the seeding that we know are not very accurate in determining who is a better team, (ala old BCS format) why should anyone get the benefit of an extra nite off and a regional spot guaranteed. They should have to play a first round game like everybody else. The NCAA doesn't have byes for their top 4 seeds. Byes are usually used for events with an unequal number of participants.
VHSL needs to fix this.
This post was edited on 2/14 7:06 AM by SgtPeppers
This post was edited on 2/14 7:10 AM by SgtPeppers
This post was edited on 2/14 8:06 AM by SgtPeppers
This post was edited on 2/14 8:18 AM by SgtPeppers