G-Men healthy and starting to tighten it up a bit. Pulaski had all kinds of self inflicted wounds with turnovers, but Graham scored at will and a couple of those PC turnovers were taken aways/stripped footballs by Graham.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope you're right. The problems that I see are with the line-play. Having skill players like Graham has helps to overcome that. I think they have improved somewhat in that area also, but still have a way to go and it's getting late in the season.Best 4 quarters Graham has put together all year last night. They had one turnover that was self inflicted. The rest were because they got the crap knocked out of them. They're getting better. Don't count Graham out, they make get this together yet.
Try to find the Pulaski County local newspaper online. They usually cover PC football pretty good.Anybody got the stats for this game? I can't find them.
Found them and just as i figured, Pulaski out-gained Graham in the game and had over 400 yards of total offense. Lot to work on for the G-men.Try to find the Pulaski County local newspaper online. They usually cover PC football pretty good.
When you have to switch up players in positions because you lost another defensive starter during the week, there will be some wrinkles especially when freshmen are having to step in for a Senior. Pulaski wasn’t winning the game regardless. I’m hoping the defense can make necessary adjustments for Tazewell’s passing game. They do have work to do but hopefully they get it done!Found them and just as i figured, Pulaski out-gained Graham in the game and had over 400 yards of total offense. Lot to work on for the G-men.
I agree with those statements and I hope we do not lose anymore starters. It’s hard to put kids in a position this late in the season they’re not used to starting because you lost another person. That happened when we lost Zach Blevins & Gage Sawyer, we had players having to step into a position they weren’t used to playing. It hurt us against King William. I’m not saying the outcome would change had they both been healthy & on defense but it certainly would have helped. Hopefully, a lot of hard work this week pays off Friday night & GMen demonstrate a noticeable difference.They have a lot of improvements still to make. Lot of run-oriented teams at the top of 2A. Gotta work on the over-pursuit and contain the edge better. Offensively, they look much better
Don't know if outcome would have changed or not, but that's losing two first team All State Linebackers against a guy like Claiborne where you just can't afford to do it. It hurt Graham offensively also as the QB played on one leg/literally had a broken bone in his leg.I agree with those statements and I hope we do not lose anymore starters. It’s hard to put kids in a position this late in the season they’re not used to starting because you lost another person. That happened when we lost Zach Blevins & Gage Sawyer, we had players having to step into a position they weren’t used to playing. It hurt us against King William. I’m not saying the outcome would change had they both been healthy & on defense but it certainly would have helped. Hopefully, a lot of hard work this week pays off Friday night & GMen demonstrate a noticeable difference.
I'd keep a close watch on the participation numbers going forward. Participation dropped dramatically each year at Auburn under Akers. Kids simply did not want to play for the guy. A group 1A school couldn't handle that drop in numbers and still put a team on the field. A big 3A school will still have numbers to field a team, but will be hard to compete at that level if that happens at PC. You've been warned.
An offense like that will put Pulaski in position to get to 7-8 wins and the postseason on a regular basis. It will not put them in position to beat Salem and go deep in the playoffs. However, considering where Pulaski has been for the overwhelming majority of their post-Hicks time as a program, the former is probably a solid, more obtainable goal.
You say the culture is not there at Pulaski.Numbers have dropped well before Akers.
I am not sure you can compare Auburn Football to anything.
Auburn has never had success in Football and I would argue they never will.
Coaches will not succeed there.
Mark Dixon lost a lot of players before his first season started at Pulaski. A few players came back after Mark had to step down, who liked Akers.
I am not sure you can use the excuse with Mark as he was a proven winner at Galax. Mark is a tough coach to play for.
The culture is not there at Pulaski.
I am sure if you go to Graham or other successful programs, the culture is there from rec football all the way up to high school. I also bet their players are used to taking it on the chin from coaches and moving on.
Pulaski has not had this for a long time.
It will take time to achieve a wider buy in before Pulaski can be successful.
Is Akers the right man? Idk.
I think most people do not want this to be the permanent offense, but with minimal weapons, they have put up good offensive numbers except for games against Salem and PH.
I guess we will see how it plays out.
Tough Question.You say the culture is not there at Pulaski.
In your opinion, how or what will it take for "the culture" to develop at Pulaski, or any where for that matter?