Dinwiddie I find it really funny that on the 4A board you praised a kid from LCA for getting a scholarship offer when you thought he transferred to Liberty Christian Academy. What makes one private school any better than any other?
I accept your opinion, but also respectfully disagree. Please don't confuse Liberty Christian with Life Christian. Yes, LibertyCA is private, and I will disdain them for the rest of my life for the way they used their money and resources to force the VHSL's hand. (Just in case you do not know this, Liberty was going to gain admittance into the VHSL, or bankrupt them, and they made that known up front.) But otherwise, I am a fan of the quality Christian educational opportunity they offer.
As far as either LCA, (and all legitimate private schools), I support them wholeheartedly. They offer a choice. And that is the way it should be.
As WP02 pointed out, LifeCA is using the vulnerability of kids, and of the parents to sell a dream. Now mind you, there is nothing wrong with providing hope and an opportunity. But, it has to be backed up by three things. 1). a solid, well though out plan, short and long term, 2). established financial resources, and 3). experienced, dedicated, ethical and moral people in charge. I strongly question their ability to provide these three essentials.
And I, like WP02 have no use for the AAU. You might ask why? Because all my life I have witnessed the AAU ride the back's of inner-city African American kids for their own personal gain.
And one last thing, I can't back away from the fact that I was suspicious, no, very suspicious, of LibertyCA abiding by the VHSL rules on recruitment. But, to date, I have heard only a few legitimate comments that some boosters, (possibly even a faculty member), had crossed the line. (It doesn't make it right, but virtually every public high school has one or more boosters that cross this line). Hence, I've mellowed my hard line stance against them, relative to this issue.