Replace Handley with Dominion..It is as simple as you think, Central received MORE points for Riverheads than Clarke did Handley
(Central vs Dominion=??)
Replace Handley with Dominion..It is as simple as you think, Central received MORE points for Riverheads than Clarke did Handley
Replace Handley with Dominion..
(Central vs Dominion=??)
I know in the long run that the point system makes the most sense. I’m just stating that in this one instance I believe it’s blatantly incorrect. I understand it is what it is. Doesn’t mean I have to think it’s right or just.
I'll chime in as a LONG time poster who has seen the changes in the playoffs and the one doing the points.
While it is unfortunate that a head to head doesn't matter in this instance, the way it is done is a good way to do it. The only issue I have with the points is with playing down in class and still getting the same points.
That part actually benefits Central in this case, but a team should be rewarded for playing bigger schools with better records. A win is a win and a loss is a loss. From the talk on here and seeing things, I think my school, Stuarts Draft is better than 2 teams who got in, and in my opinion they are better than 2 of the teams who beat them in close games, meaning if we went by eye test or committee then things could change.
Every team who plays for a championship is going to have to play on the road. And isn't part of the argument that Central beat Clarke AT Clarke? So they can do it again. It's nothing unfair, SOS matters, thus why CC is ahead.
To someone else's point, I dont think there are 7 schools in B who can win it all, but there are certainly AT LEAST 4. Clarke, Central, Lee and Luray. Luray was a good bit better than any team I have seen this year, and would be on par with SD, RH, and Richlands last year
Travel figures in to a lot of this stuff Clarke is in proximity to some higher seeds where as maybe Central was not,but when the smoke clears I imagine the best team will stand or if not they will get killed down the road.And I’m not a Central fan....just pointing out this shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone. You get rewarded for playing a tougher schedule, I for one think it’s a decent system. Just like college if you play a weak schedule you get to watch the playoffs from home.
Central is not that far from Winchester area. They could schedule better teams. I don't get some people on here bad mouthing Clarke . They went out and scheduled teams 2 classifications above them (and won). Dominion was a huge win. Handley is not a great team but they are 4A and should beat a good 2A team (but did not). Waynesboro (3A) is a decent team but Clarke beat them. What else are they supposed to do? And Central beat the 2 best teams on their schedule (Clarke and Riverheads). Obviously the Central schedule wasn't strong enough, even with those 2 big wins or the would have outpointed Clarke. So why all the gnashing of teeth over who is 1 or 2? I remember, not too long ago, that some 8-2 and 7-3 teams did not make the playoffs at all.
Handley, Millbrook, Sherando do not want a bunch of 2A teams on their schedule. The Bull Run District is down to five teams. Maybe better leadership is needed (like the Shenandoah District) to keep teams from leaving and creating scheduling problems.Central is not that far from Winchester area. They could schedule better teams. I don't get some people on here bad mouthing Clarke . They went out and scheduled teams 2 classifications above them (and won). Dominion was a huge win. Handley is not a great team but they are 4A and should beat a good 2A team (but did not). Waynesboro (3A) is a decent team but Clarke beat them. What else are they supposed to do? And Central beat the 2 best teams on their schedule (Clarke and Riverheads). Obviously the Central schedule wasn't strong enough, even with those 2 big wins or the would have outpointed Clarke. So why all the gnashing of teeth over who is 1 or 2? I remember, not too long ago, that some 8-2 and 7-3 teams did not make the playoffs at all.
Handley, Millbrook, Sherando do not want a bunch of 2A teams on their schedule. The Bull Run District is down to five teams. Maybe better leadership is needed (like the Shenandoah District) to keep teams from leaving and creating scheduling problems.
I would suspect a change in both the Bull Run and Shenandoah districts in the next cycle especially if Mason goes 3A.
Since we have mixed districts, it doesn't matter what Mason does unless their enrollment triples. But I do hope there are some changes. Here's my proposal:
Bull Run
Strasburg
ClarkeCounty
Mason,George
Skyline
WarrenCounty
Skyline II
RappahannockCo.
Jackson,Stonewall-Q
Luray
MadisonCo.
PageCounty
EastRockingham
Central(W)
Spotswood
Shenandoah
Riverheads
BuffaloGap
StuartsDraft
WilsonMemorial
Lee,R.E.(St.)
FortDefiance
Waynesboro
They are not supposed to lose to Central by 40 and be ranked over them.Central is not that far from Winchester area. They could schedule better teams. I don't get some people on here bad mouthing Clarke . They went out and scheduled teams 2 classifications above them (and won). Dominion was a huge win. Handley is not a great team but they are 4A and should beat a good 2A team (but did not). Waynesboro (3A) is a decent team but Clarke beat them. What else are they supposed to do? And Central beat the 2 best teams on their schedule (Clarke and Riverheads). Obviously the Central schedule wasn't strong enough, even with those 2 big wins or the would have outpointed Clarke. So why all the gnashing of teeth over who is 1 or 2? I remember, not too long ago, that some 8-2 and 7-3 teams did not make the playoffs at all.
[QUOTE="I would suspect a change in both the Bull Run and Shenandoah districts in the next cycle especially if Mason goes 3A.
Riverheads should be in 2A anyway.
Riverheads should be in 2A anyway.[/QUOTE said:Reason being.......they're the biggest 1A and they're really good? Or what?
Maybe we should move Clarke and Central up to 3A since they’re successful in football and close to the line (SARCASM)I sure don't hear anyone complaining about 1A Windsor with 472 kids. I wonder if that would be different if the football team was 9-1 instead of 0-10. Probably no one complaining either if Riverheads was 5-5 instead of usually just having 1 or 2 losses.
Good post and I like but Clarke is around 690 or lower currently so not close to the "line" but I dig your thinking on it.Maybe we should move Clarke and Central up to 3A since they’re successful in football and close to the line (SARCASM)
Good idea.Maybe we should move Clarke and Central up to 3A since they’re successful in football and close to the line (SARCASM)
Says who? Power points are what matter or did you miss the memo?They are not supposed to lose to Central by 40 and be ranked over them.
What the heck, just put 'em in 3A and get it over with!1.5A
Let’s just do away with classification in generalWhat the heck, just put 'em in 3A and get it over with!1.5A
you have teams with 480 students in the same class as teams with 700,seems a big difference to me.Good post and I like but Clarke is around 690 or lower currently so not close to the "line" but I dig your thinking on it.
you have teams with 480 students in the same class as teams with 700,seems a big difference to me.Good post and I like but Clarke is around 690 or lower currently so not close to the "line" but I dig your thinking on it.
That could be cool actually.I still think the club soccer method of having the top three finishers moving up and bottom three moving down a division would squash some of this.
For me it would be final standings based on playoffs for the top and regular season results for bottom. Sure it would complicate things but this scheduling of cupcakes would be eliminated because you wouldn’t get the same points year after year of the scheduling cycle. Run it over in your mind the possibility of the shake up it would cause.That could be cool actually.
Adjust as needed per sport.
But would you adjust based on post season? If you did 4 teams, you would have one team per region move up yearly.
Or would you base upon power points?
For me it would be final standings based on playoffs for the top and regular season results for bottom. Sure it would complicate things but this scheduling of cupcakes would be eliminated because you wouldn’t get the same points year after year of the scheduling cycle. Run it over in your mind the possibility of the shake up it would cause.That could be cool actually.
Adjust as needed per sport.
But would you adjust based on post season? If you did 4 teams, you would have one team per region move up yearly.
Or would you base upon power points?
I did not need that type of answer,sorry i asked.Let’s have 25 divisions
1-100 students is 1A
101-200 is 2A
201-300 is 3A
Etc
Make sure everyone has a fair and equal shot to every state championship. Can’t leave anyone out. We are all winners here!
Uh, high school teams change every year as students matriculate...not so with club teams who are somewhat consistent. Unless your school is Gate City and use the "holdback" plan...then you can have the same team for years...I still think the club soccer method of having the top three finishers moving up and bottom three moving down a division would squash some of this.
It is/was just an attempt at levity. Nothing will please the masses so I figured that we should think outside our normal comfort zone and discuss alternate realities. Is the current system going to stay in place? Not a chance. Will the next one, just speculating but I am gonna go with no again.Uh, high school teams change every year as students matriculate...not so with club teams who are somewhat consistent. Unless your school is Gate City and use the "holdback" plan...then you can have the same team for years...