Here's my question. Does Bluefield come out ahead then? If Bluefield agree to take all of the home games if Bluefield pays rent, Bluefield, WV, still wants their money, and that means Bluefield is now paying for 1 extra game at Mitchell on years when they don't regularly do that.
It's all about money. Makes sense to play at Mitchell if you get more money, but again, if you are losing money, then it doesn't.
For Bluefield, if they take all of the home games, what does Mitchell/Bluefield, WV, do? I guarantee you Bluefield, WV, wants their rent money and Bluefield High, who would be paying for 5 games normally, would then pay for 6 games, and Bluefield, WV, ain't going to make that 6th home game for Bluefield High a freebie. Totally then depends if it's advantageous for Bluefield financially. I do not know that answer. Have no idea.
My guess. If both teams agreed to split the gate and both paid rent for that game and continued to do as they do now, the gate split Overcomes the coat of rent. I think? I have no idea. This is kind of my question.
Additionally, you got Tazewell County in the picture heavily now. So, "we funded a new stadium that you all wanted, but you only want to play 4 home games and play another home game at Mitchell in West Va, which is the same bunch we just had a problem with, and we aren't paying for any rent for 1 game, and if you do play there, we (Tazewell County) get a cut of that money, and your profit is now so small you should have just played at home."