I agree there are teams who aren't as proven but I think it is dangerous to look past them. I am sure you could also understand why some of the less proven teams would get excited. Hell, Monacan had 10 years in a row of losing football. Your damn right we get excited. I think your view is a bit warped but I understand that you are looking through a different lens than the rest of us bc of who your team is. We will keep trying to taste that pie and you will keep trying to hold it for yourself. Neither opinion or view is really wrong just depends your perspective. I am excited by what Glass did. They played Dinwiddie tough in a scrimmage and man-handled a decent C'ville team. I think they are "radar-worthy" in my book.
I just believe it when I see it. If you want an example, Byrd. Byrd has NEVER been more than 2 games into the POs. Byrd next year, maybe I look at them differently but Byrd has had the same coach for the past nearly 40 years and that guy just can't seem to get it done in the POs (he's really good at playing Salem, though). Now with a new coach, who knows, but I'll believe Byrd when I see it. There are other programs who wear a similar hat. Things can change, sure, Clemson is a terrific example of this but a VT, for example, must earn their way and they have yet to earn it with consistent wins on a big stage when things matter. Or another local option, 3A Lord Botetourt. LB was once a chump program, frequently abused by Salem in week 1 and everyone else in week 2-10. Now they're way different than they used to be and have built themselves up into a bit of a force in the area on that level.
I'm not saying things can't change but I don't like buying the hype until I see the product. I barely buy Salem's hype sometimes until things are really rolling.