ADVERTISEMENT

Winchester Star Article on 4C Playoff Changes

Oct 9, 2014
96
64
18
Region 4C football playoffs expanding to eight teams; district standings will determine qualifiers


Fans of Region 4C football are not only going to have a much easier time figuring out who’s heading to the postseason this year, but there’s also going to be more teams in the playoffs.

Region 4C is expanding its postseason from six to eight teams, and those eight spots will be filled by four teams each from the Northwestern District and the Dulles District. The Northwestern has eight Class 4 schools while the Dulles has seven.

Those eight qualifiers will be determined by the win-loss records in each district and not the Virginia High School League’s power points rating system that people are accustomed to, though. Teams will need to finish in the top four in their district’s standings to participate in the postseason. At the end of the regular season, power ratings will come into play if there’s a tie in the standings between three teams or more that can’t be broken by the results of head-to-head matchups.


Out of 24 regions in the state, Region 4C was only of two that sent fewer than eight teams to the postseason last year.

When the VHSL adopted a 24-region format in 2017, the feeling among Region 4C activities coordinators was that having eight teams qualify for the postseason — which would be more than 50 percent of the region’s 14 teams — would take away the significance of what it actually means to qualify for the postseason. For example, only six teams from the Northwestern and Dulles — the only two districts in the newly formed Region 4C in 2017 — had winning records in 2016. Ultimately, the region decided on six teams for 2017.

“We’ve discussed [going to eight teams] for the past several years,” Millbrook coordinator of student activities Scott Mankins said. “[In 2017], at the time, we didn’t want to have eight teams if that meant taking three teams with losing records.”

But in 2017 eight teams from the two districts had winning records — including 7-3 Heritage (Leesburg) — and in 2018 six had winning records and three teams went 5-5. The activities coordinators of the now 15-team region decided it was time to mirror what most of the state was doing with its football postseason.

“We revisit [our system] each year,” said Mankins, who added that the region’s activities coordinators frequently seek input from coaches. “As competitive as our region has been the past few years, we thought the time was right to go ahead and expand [the number of playoff teams] from six to eight.”

Handley director of student activities Reed Prosser is glad the expansion is in place. He coached that 7-3 Heritage team that missed the playoffs in 2017, and in his first year as Handley’s DSA the Judges went 5-5 and finished eighth in the power ratings.

“It’s something I’ve been fighting for for a long time,” Prosser said. “I think the quality of football in our area — in Loudoun, the Winchester-Frederick area, and Fauquier — is great. When you have a situation where you’re going 8-2 or 7-3 and not making the playoffs, that’s not really the model we want to follow.”

Sherando has only missed the playoffs twice under head coach Bill Hall since 2004, a year that saw the Warriors miss the playoffs with an 8-2 record. Hall said back in 2017 there were a lot of things to like about the upcoming six-team region playoff format and he reiterated those points in a phone interview Tuesday. But he added on Tuesday he has no issues with an eight-team playoff format either.

“I saw some advantages with six in terms of being able to get a [first-round] bye when you earn that,” Hall said. “But I’m also comfortable with eight. What my only concern has ever been is that you don’t want to water the playoffs down. You want it to be hard to get in [the playoffs]. As long as everybody is really successful among those eight teams that get in, I’m good with it.”

While going from six to eight teams isn’t unusual, the method in which Region 4C will group its eight qualifiers will provide a unique look.

The eight Class 4 Northwestern District schools will each play one game against each other for a total of seven games, and the seven Class 4 Dulles District schools will each play one game against each other for a total of six, with the four teams holding the best records in these games in their respective districts moving on to the postseason. According to VHSL administrative assistant Lora Bickley, none of the other 23 regions are currently planning to use the VHSL power points rating system.

James Wood coach Ryan Morgan is not only looking forward to an eight-team playoff format, but he also likes the idea of having standings determine the playoff qualifiers.

On Oct. 6 last year, fourth-place Liberty (3-3 in district play) beat fifth-place James Wood (2-4 district) 32-23, but the Colonels had more total yards and led early in the second half. A James Wood win that night would have resulted in a fourth-place finish and a playoff spot using this year’s qualifying system.

“I think [using the standings] makes it a little bit easier to judge and makes the goals a little bit clearer,” Morgan said. “The goal for us is to always win each game. If you go 10-0, you’re going to make the playoffs, but that’s not very realistic for most teams.

“Most of the season I ignore [the playoff ratings]. Getting too wrapped up in it is a little bit too difficult because there’s a lot that goes into it. But with the standings, you don’t have to make a bunch of different calculations. You just look at the won-loss records of the teams in your district and you see if you’re on pace to be in or you’re on pace to be out.”

The reasons why district standings are being used as a playoff qualifier and not the VHSL power ratings — which is what Region 4C used previously — is to limit regular-season rematches in the postseason.

All four quarterfinals games will feature Northwestern teams taking on Dulles teams. The No. 1 Northwestern team will host the No. 4 Dulles team, the No. 2 Northwestern team will host the No. 3 Dulles team, the No. 1 Dulles team will host the No. 4 Northwestern District team, and the No. 2 Dulles team will host the No. 3 Northwestern team.

That format might also prevent regular-season rematches in the semifinals — for example, if the four home teams win, then the No. 1 Northwestern team will host the No. 2 Dulles team and the No. 1 Dulles team will host the No. 2 Northwestern team. (The No. 1. Northwestern-No. 4 Dulles winner will play the No. 2 Dulles-No. 3 Northwestern winner in one semifinal and the other four teams will make up the other half of the bracket.)

If two teams on the same seed line played each other — for example, if the top-seeded teams from both the Northwestern District and the Dulles District advance to the championship game — then the team with the higher power points rating will host the game.

Last year, there wasn’t a game pitting the Northwestern District against the Dulles District until the championship game featuring Woodgrove and Sherando. One half of the bracket featured three Northwestern teams and the other half featured three Dulles teams.

“We wanted the teams advancing to the regional playoffs not so much to have a rematch of a regular-season game, but to [play] a competitive team that wasn’t necessarily a rematch,” said Mankins, who added that Region 4C received permission from the VHSL to use this format.

The odds of regular-season rematches in the quarterfinals this year are slim. The only regular-season games featuring Northwestern and Dulles teams are Fauquier against Loudoun County on Aug. 30, Millbrook vs. Loudoun County on Sept. 6, Millbrook against Heritage on Sept. 13, and Fauquier vs. Heritage on Sept. 20. Even with that, there would be a least eight weeks between games if any of these teams did meet again.

Hall has often stated over the years that he likes seeing new teams come playoff time, so having a system in place that ensures Sherando will see a new brand new opponent in the first round of the playoffs (should it qualify) is something he’s looking forward to.

“We’re already guaranteed to play teams in our district in the regular season,” Hall said. “I’d much rather play somebody different in the playoffs. It’s fun for us to play different competition. I think it’s good for the kids, I think it’s good for our fans, and I think it’s good for regional competition.”

Morgan agrees.

“You want to see some new teams play,” Morgan said. “It’s nice to see some new styles of play, some new team colors, and new school bands and all that kind of stuff. It’s good to get some fresh blood and see some teams you don’t normally get to play.”

Mankins said there’s no set number of years that this system is designed to last, but it was implemented with the hope that it’s a system that most people will be pleased with for a long time.

“We don’t want to change every year, but we revisit each of our sports and our activities on an annual basis,” Mankins said. “At the all-district meetings and all-region meetings that we hold, those aren’t just to vote on the all-district teams and all-region teams. It’s also to get input from those coaches at those meetings. We want to know what’s working right, what do you want to see changed, what’s the rationale behind why you want something changed. And each of us talks to our head coaches regularly.

“We have discussions, but we also don’t want to be too quick to make a change just because somebody’s not happy in one year.”



— Contact Robert Niedzwiecki at

rniedzwiecki@winchesterstar.com
 
With Broad Run and Tuscarora coming down, going to eight teams is a smart decision. The other changes are nice as well.
 
This is an interesting change. Definitely like going to 8. It will be interesting to see if other regions look at using district standing for placement for playoff seeding instead of (or at least before) the ratings. I like district play meaning more. I know there are mixed districts throughout the state as well which could cause others to not make this type of move.

What I don't like is that not OOD games mean a lot less. Really only mean something in the event of a tie
 
On paper, a sound plan; I think it will work in most years. But with three or four non-district games on a team's schedule, that is where the issue arises. Team A goes 3-4 in their district, which is better than the other district, and wins all three OOD games against strong teams to finish 6-4. Team B from the weaker district goes 4-2 in their district and wins four OOD games against weak competition to go 8-2. Which team is probably better? I say Team A but they probably don't get in. I like the power points. They are complicated to understand, but they do what they are intended to do.
Note: I am not inferring that the Northwestern is better than the Dulles by indicating the hypothetical district records in my example (honestly, I don't know) - just using numbers to illustrate my point.
 
On paper, a sound plan; I think it will work in most years. But with three or four non-district games on a team's schedule, that is where the issue arises. Team A goes 3-4 in their district, which is better than the other district, and wins all three OOD games against strong teams to finish 6-4. Team B from the weaker district goes 4-2 in their district and wins four OOD games against weak competition to go 8-2. Which team is probably better? I say Team A but they probably don't get in. I like the power points. They are complicated to understand, but they do what they are intended to do.
Note: I am not inferring that the Northwestern is better than the Dulles by indicating the hypothetical district records in my example (honestly, I don't know) - just using numbers to illustrate my point.
It is what it is. I'm sure the Big 10 East with teams like Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State and Penn State feel their division is tougher than the division with Illinois, Nebraska, Purdue and Minnesota. If you're good it always will be settled on the field. But I do see were you're coming from. Because most definitely people will look at the power points and compare to the actual district seedings. I think it may convince teams to schedule tougher OOD teams because a lost want hurt you and your team can get better by facing good competition. But I think with Tusky and Broad Run coming down you had to expand. I personally like how this region try different ideas. I could be wrong but they were one of the few that did a 6 team region playoffs?
 
It is what it is. I'm sure the Big 10 East with teams like Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State and Penn State feel their division is tougher than the division with Illinois, Nebraska, Purdue and Minnesota. If you're good it always will be settled on the field. But I do see were you're coming from. Because most definitely people will look at the power points and compare to the actual district seedings. I think it may convince teams to schedule tougher OOD teams because a lost want hurt you and your team can get better by facing good competition. But I think with Tusky and Broad Run coming down you had to expand. I personally like how this region try different ideas. I could be wrong but they were one of the few that did a 6 team region playoffs?
I absolutely agree they should expand, as I am not a fan of byes either. I understand both sides of that argument; just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aw19752
On paper, a sound plan; I think it will work in most years. But with three or four non-district games on a team's schedule, that is where the issue arises. Team A goes 3-4 in their district, which is better than the other district, and wins all three OOD games against strong teams to finish 6-4. Team B from the weaker district goes 4-2 in their district and wins four OOD games against weak competition to go 8-2. Which team is probably better? I say Team A but they probably don't get in. I like the power points. They are complicated to understand, but they do what they are intended to do.
Note: I am not inferring that the Northwestern is better than the Dulles by indicating the hypothetical district records in my example (honestly, I don't know) - just using numbers to illustrate my point.

I think the two potential issues would be
A- a team goes 4-2 in district then loses their OOD games to go 4-6. Another team from the same district goes 2-4 but runs the OOD schedule to go 6-4. Assuming they played similar competition out of district, the second team would have A higher rating and miss the playoffs at 2-4 in the district while the first team might host a game in the playoffs as the #2 seed from their district.

The other would be if a district had 5 really strong teams and they all finished say 4-3/3-3 or better but won OOD games to all be 7+ wins and the other district had 2 strong teams and you get 1 or 2 teams under .500 in while a 7-3 is left out.

All hypothetical and we probably won't see either scenario this year. Most years it will work out fine. Every few years the 5th team in one district will believe they are more deserving than the 4th in the other. But if they stick to this for a long period of time there will be a year down the line where it didn't work right.

But simply finish in the top 4 and you advance.
 
I think the two potential issues would be
A- a team goes 4-2 in district then loses their OOD games to go 4-6. Another team from the same district goes 2-4 but runs the OOD schedule to go 6-4. Assuming they played similar competition out of district, the second team would have A higher rating and miss the playoffs at 2-4 in the district while the first team might host a game in the playoffs as the #2 seed from their district.

The other would be if a district had 5 really strong teams and they all finished say 4-3/3-3 or better but won OOD games to all be 7+ wins and the other district had 2 strong teams and you get 1 or 2 teams under .500 in while a 7-3 is left out.

All hypothetical and we probably won't see either scenario this year. Most years it will work out fine. Every few years the 5th team in one district will believe they are more deserving than the 4th in the other. But if they stick to this for a long period of time there will be a year down the line where it didn't work right.

But simply finish in the top 4 and you advance.
In your example what is Team A beat Team B in district play? Head to head head and district record says Team A is more deserving in my opinion.
 
Proof is in the pudding sir
I’d argue that Northwestern has more impact teams than Dulles. Now, does Dulles have the top two teams in Broad Run and Tuscarora? Yeah, certainly. Anyone who would argue otherwise is crazy. After them, though, who does Dulles have? LC? Heritage? Dominion? LV? When’s the last time any of those teams did anything? Not that I mean disrespect to them (Heritage is KR’s first game- they’d be foolish to overlook Heritage); I’m just using your same logic against Dulles.

I’d argue that Sherando, Kettle Run, Millbrook, and Liberty are all better than the teams behind Broad Run and Tuscarora. So while Dulles has the top two, NW is deeper. Given all that, I say they’re two pretty well-matched districts. This postseason should be fun to watch!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shruikan
This is an interesting change. Definitely like going to 8. It will be interesting to see if other regions look at using district standing for placement for playoff seeding instead of (or at least before) the ratings. I like district play meaning more. I know there are mixed districts throughout the state as well which could cause others to not make this type of move.

What I don't like is that not OOD games mean a lot less. Really only mean something in the event of a tie
If I understand correctly, all of the regions are going to use records to determine seeding but I doubt it will just be district records since most regions are compromised of more than two districts.
 
Dulles is no comparison to the NWD in my opinion, outside of Sherando what else does the NWD have? Nothing elite that I’ve seen

Legit question. How's Skyline going to do this year? I wanted to get out to the 7 on 7 they were hosting but the heat ended up cancelling it. The NVD article said they got 74 guys out this year, sounds like a solid number.
 
Legit question. How's Skyline going to do this year? I wanted to get out to the 7 on 7 they were hosting but the heat ended up cancelling it. The NVD article said they got 74 guys out this year, sounds like a solid number.

Young qb, replacing key skill positions, defense returns a lot, going to be a struggle to score some points though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shruikan
Kind of new to the area in the last few years , what are the chances James Wood beats Sherando game one?
 
Kind of new to the area in the last few years , what are the chances James Wood beats Sherando game one?

Quite a bit higher than some would suggest. James Wood has a good coach now and they've had a load of close games with Sherando over the years. For as lopsided as the series is, many of them have been one or two score games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigBWincCity
Kind of new to the area in the last few years , what are the chances James Wood beats Sherando game one?
I think it's a little too early to have a good feel on this game, or even season at that. If I had to guess, I'd say it'll be a closer game, maybe even competitive in the first half, but it seems like the Sherando team could be decent this year, even after losing a lot of players. I can tough more on this after I see some scrimmaging.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT