ADVERTISEMENT

Well, Well. Week 10. What caught my eye this week?

Looking at both of their schedules up to this point neither one should be considered the best to me. We kill KG and Eastern View for supposedly weak schedules and it’s the same with these two teams. At least in Huguenots case they were just locked into a weak Dominion district this year. Matoaca's OOD schedule was terrible.
Huguenot did the best they could in a year 2 of a two year cycle. It sucks that that district only allows for 1-2 OOD games.

Well, Well. Week 10. What caught my eye this week?

Them Varina Blue Devils and Huguenot Falcons took care of business against two teams with a combined 15-3. record. Going to be hard scoring on Varina’s defense thru the air and hard stopping that Huguenot offense. Wild that Huguenot has gone 9-0 and beat Manchester, Bird and Midlo in blowout fashion and Matoaca is considered the best team in the 804 by multiple outlets. Varina’s mistakes early on in the season, may have cost them a 1 seed. We wouldn’t be having any discussions had they beaten Indian River.
Looking at both of their schedules up to this point neither one should be considered the best to me. We kill KG and Eastern View for supposedly weak schedules and its the same with these two teams. At least in Huguenots case they were just locked into a weak Dominion district this year. Matoaca's OOD schedule was terrible.
  • Like
Reactions: edwinanderson2nd

STICK A FORK IN THEM

It’s my understanding it’s 3 superintendents
Thanks for the info. I believe the composition of the Appeals Committee and the transparency with which they operate will be critical to how the final result is perceived. By the transparency with which they operate, I mean not only the disclosure of the decision but, discussion and disclosure, as allowed and appropriate, of the information and arguments from BOTH sides that they considered in reaching their decision.
  • Like
Reactions: gwb16 and OCBoy

STICK A FORK IN THEM

One question, does anybody know who the members of the appeals committee are and, if so, has that information been made public any where?

I also agree with OCBoy that this is already a disaster or, maybe more aptly, a bad joke. One group does an "investigation" and fully exonerates while a second group does an "investigation" and recommends a 2 year post season ban. Now they want a third group to call balls and strikes and decide the outcome? The disparity in the findings between the first two groups makes this far more than a difference of opinion to be resolved by an independent third party. I also doubt anyone is coming out of this vindicated or looking good.
  • Like
Reactions: OCBoy

Final: Tazewell 245, Graham 185

Yeah but that was after they both dove straight for each knee. Only reason he didn't get hurt was because of a defensive reaction backing up. It's on film tape doesn't lie.
Nothing illegal with diving at the knees. Holding on afterwards, yes. But that is just an old fashion cut block that you are talking about. You can only cut block players that start on the LOS. Can't cut block in high school down field like you can in college. Also the players doing the cut block must start on the LOS and can be no wider than the tight end.
  • Like
Reactions: 7MileFord
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT