I feel yea !! Culpepper ran wild cat or whatever u call it formation the hole first half and they drove all the way down the field and they where slow Heritage going to look at that all u going to see QB run it with unbalanced out of shot gun and pick up big chunks of yards . With a lot of speed and power . I could be wrong but Phoebus just looks undersized . Tape can full yea a lot of times and could be different leval of competition out that way.Teams they play could be really good or not that good and make a team look better then they Actually Are . Should be a good game sat . We played Heritage twice this year . I don’t think they are as good as last years team .
"Culpepper ran wildcat or whatever the whole first half, and they drove all the way down the field", and yet they were down 21 to 7 at halftime.
You failed to note, Phoebus had the ball only one play in the first quarter "Score", two series in the second quarter"Score"', Score", one series in the third quarter "SCORE", and after Culpepper scored in the forth quarter Phoebus took only 4 plays, to "Score" again.
Final Phoebus 35 - Culpepper 14.
Poor undersized Phoebus ran 35 offensive plays and scored 35 offensive points! Culpepper ran 47 offensive plays and scored14 offensive points. Culpepper rushed for 124 yards on 47 carries, or a whole 2.63 yards per carry. Phoebus almost got that, 107 yards, in less than half the carries, 23. Phoebus completed 11 of 12 passes for 246 yards, or 20.5 yards an attempt.
This is not meant to disparage Culpepper, merely to suggest that you apparently missed a whole lot of things that were going on in the Phoebus- Culpepper game.
I don't know anything about Heritage, but I do know Phoebus! Heritage by 2 touchdowns seems a lot. Heritage's QB may well pick up "big chunks of yards , with a lot of speed and power", and Heritage may win, but I wouldn't count on it. If Heritage is all you claim them to be, this should be a really good game!