Curious about the contradictory logic. If as many said, Abingdon, a 3A school was not a real test for Richlands because they had only played sub par teams, then what does that say about Richlands being primed for the playoffs? If that is true then the only really good team then that Richlands has played (if not Abingdon) was Union and that was a loss. Some of you guys want it both ways. You hail the lopsided scores and the yardage but then say the team you played wasn't a real test. Am I confused or isn't that contradictory. And what if Union isn't the real deal either? Other than Richlands what other real good team has Union beat? Union just squeaked by both Gate and Central neither of which are world beaters.