I agree that it was a good hire for Huguenot, for the simple fact that we are talking about them, and prior to this, we weren't. I hope that the new coach is able to help those young men use athletics to better the rest of their lives. Do I think they will be a power? No. Do I think they can be competitive this the other teams in their district? Maybe. It will be a tough hill to climb with a district schedule that includes Manchester, Bird, Powhatan, etc, and then a brutal region. He will face a myriad of challenges off the field that some of the county schools don't have to deal with. But that doesn't mean it can't be done. I hope he is in it for the right reasons.
Ultimately it comes down to how those involved define success. Is success winning 8 games? Is success making the playoffs? Is success preparing and getting kids to the next level? Is success just getting those kids to practice/weightroom every day so that they do not have so much idle time that can lead to poor decisions? Is success giving those kids and that school something to be excited about? Is success getting those kids across the stage at graduation? Is success helping those kids set and reach goals that they might now otherwise strive for?
Winning is a poor measure of success because coaches have much less control over it than people think. Coaches don't control the makeup of their team in most cases. They cook with what is in the kitchen, and the quality of that meal is often based on the ingredients on hand. You can't turn canned tuna fish into prime rib. But you might be able to make a darn fine meal from tuna. On the other hand, I've seen a great steak ruined by too much of something or not enough of something else.
The AD there is a good guy and I don't think he will allow anyone to color outside the lines. Especially considering they will already be the focus of so much attention due to the hire. Regardless, I wish all involved the best of luck.