Region D top spot by my math
- Thread starter SFUWO
- Start date
LCA only played 9 games so that would put it at my original tally with a tie 29.9
Help me out here. What's the 2 for (8+2+10)? 10 for the rider points, but LCA only played 9 games, so shouldn't that be 9? Or is the 10 for something else? Really not 100% on the ratings.
The 2 is for playing a team that is one div down
It should be 9 for for the games LCA played
Look at tiebreaker G. Average Rating percentage of opponents. I did the math last week and Salem was ahead. Blacksburg's record might doom them. I will try and run the numbers. It's 30 to 30 in my book.
Come on @tommythecpa do the math. It's a chore, because we don't have every teams ratings. It was easier last week, because I already had them. Too much work. 😂
This is a job for the VHSL algorithm.
#6 Sherando (5-5) @ #3 E.C. Glass (7-3)
#7 GW-Danville (6-4) @ #2 Salem/Jeff. Forest (9-1)
-
#5 John Handley (7-3) @ #4 Millbrook (7-3)
#8 Liberty (Beal) (5-5) @ #1 Salem/Jeff. Forest (9-1)
#7 GW-Danville (6-4) @ #2 Salem/Jeff. Forest (9-1)
-
#5 John Handley (7-3) @ #4 Millbrook (7-3)
#8 Liberty (Beal) (5-5) @ #1 Salem/Jeff. Forest (9-1)
I sense a familiar foe on the horizon for Salem next week. Not sure the opponent will be thrilled to hear the news, though.
Both played LCA, so they're left out of this.
Salem : 245+315+173+313+165+203+179+256+176=2025
Jeff : 239+185+205+230+257+145+279+196+188= 1924
#6 Sherando (5-5) @ #3 E.C. Glass (7-3)
#7 GW-Danville (6-4) @ #2 Jeff. Forest (9-1)
-
#5 John Handley (7-3) @ #4 Millbrook (7-3)
#8 Liberty (Beal) (5-5) @ #1 Salem (9-1)
Salem : 245+315+173+313+165+203+179+256+176=2025
Jeff : 239+185+205+230+257+145+279+196+188= 1924
#6 Sherando (5-5) @ #3 E.C. Glass (7-3)
#7 GW-Danville (6-4) @ #2 Jeff. Forest (9-1)
-
#5 John Handley (7-3) @ #4 Millbrook (7-3)
#8 Liberty (Beal) (5-5) @ #1 Salem (9-1)
Based on what our Robert Anderson is projecting, it looks like Salem will win the tie-breaker over Jefferson Forest on one of the last tie-breakers (which if I recall correctly from our conversation is either G or H when it comes to the higher average power rating of opponents).
We'll know officially when the VHSL releases the pairings on Sunday, though.
We'll know officially when the VHSL releases the pairings on Sunday, though.
It’ll be Carroll County ugly. I hate it but I’ve been b*tch slapped with words all for giving honest and factual takes so I don’t even talk about it anymore.
Why did WSLS already post JF 1 and Salem 2? Do they know something we don't know or do they not know what you guys know?
Not sure - and it's unofficial of course until the VHSL releases them (and even they have had a couple mistakes in past that they had to fix)... but I can speak for Robert and myself that we have spent HOURS of adding up the math and spreadsheets...
Based on what he's showing doing the numbers for a ton of regions, it looks like they are tied. When you stare at numbers for hours upon hours though, it's easy to miss a bonus point here or there... I caught something in Region 2A late last night around Midnight that was not initially plugged in someone's computer, so it happens.
From 2019, assume it is still relevant. They start listing tiebreakers on page 133.
(g) The team with the higher average rating of all of each team's opponents.
I'm not going to look into all of that, I'll wait for someone to tell me, but I'd imagine Salem is just because of how weak JF's out of district opponents were.
Love yall too brother. I refuse to celebrate beating Tunstall but glad the boys are in the playoffs.
That was a projection it's not official. It is on WSLS news sports section
Last edited:
If you look at the tab you use to see their brackets. It says projections. They were not official
