Teams with less than three wins last night was 0 for 10 not counting todays games. remember that I posted that the winning teams probably subed early and not for that the scores would been worse than they were. 8 0f the 10 wins was by 4 td's or more with 5 shutouts. on average the winning teams averaged 40 points and gave up a little over 4 points a game. now all you people that said teams like this deserve to be in now how you feel?
now I approved of the 4 and 6 teams making it but now I don't know. they played 14 games and 1 team won. average points by the winner was over 52 points a game and the losers with 1 winner 11 a game. there was a 70 to 0 game two 40 to 0 games a 63 to 0 game a 69 to 30 game a 50 to 17 game and a 52 to 13 game and only 1 close loss 13 to 6. remember most of the winning coaches have such a big lead they sub early and the losers score on the subs. LORD knows what the scores would have been if they left in their starters. you sure this group should be rewarded by getting in?
now I still believe the 5 and 5 teams should be the cut off line but they didn't do much better. they played in 21 games and won but 3.there was scores like 56 to 14 49 to 14 48 to 12 42 to 0 63 to 21 48 to 0 54 to 16 there are more lopsided wins that I won't mention. yall be the judge do I need to say more. sorry ROD your theory of all these teams being rewarded by making the playoffs don't float my boat! vhsl you need to make the playoffs better by giving teams that deserve to be in the playoffs a shot and let the weaker teams pack up their bags and stay home and get ready for basketball.
This post was edited on 11/15 6:46 PM by skynard1
This post was edited on 11/15 7:19 PM by skynard1
This post was edited on 11/15 9:34 PM by skynard1
now I approved of the 4 and 6 teams making it but now I don't know. they played 14 games and 1 team won. average points by the winner was over 52 points a game and the losers with 1 winner 11 a game. there was a 70 to 0 game two 40 to 0 games a 63 to 0 game a 69 to 30 game a 50 to 17 game and a 52 to 13 game and only 1 close loss 13 to 6. remember most of the winning coaches have such a big lead they sub early and the losers score on the subs. LORD knows what the scores would have been if they left in their starters. you sure this group should be rewarded by getting in?
now I still believe the 5 and 5 teams should be the cut off line but they didn't do much better. they played in 21 games and won but 3.there was scores like 56 to 14 49 to 14 48 to 12 42 to 0 63 to 21 48 to 0 54 to 16 there are more lopsided wins that I won't mention. yall be the judge do I need to say more. sorry ROD your theory of all these teams being rewarded by making the playoffs don't float my boat! vhsl you need to make the playoffs better by giving teams that deserve to be in the playoffs a shot and let the weaker teams pack up their bags and stay home and get ready for basketball.
This post was edited on 11/15 6:46 PM by skynard1
This post was edited on 11/15 7:19 PM by skynard1
This post was edited on 11/15 9:34 PM by skynard1
