@Bucktown434, you assume a lot and are terribly wrong. I always rely on and argue legality/ policy. Please do your research. I responded solely based on the fact that a father had filed damages in excess of 1.3 million. In order to win that type of judgement he would have to prove Hayfield brought in that kind of money at the gate or his sons are losing contracted revenue. Let's just play the game and pretend the children are contracted through an NIL. The father would then have show how they lost 1.3 million. Thus the statement they must have big NIL deals in NOVA. What two high school athletes make 1.3 million? Not to mention ones who are under diverse financial hardship as noted in the injunction. It's one big contradiction.
Now I do care about hs sports and to be perfectly honest, if a court rules against the VHSL it will wreck hs sports in more ways than one. I guess that's what you and others with the same mindset desire. Please be careful what wish for. 80% of the athletic funding comes from the private donors you hate so much.